14 Jun 2010    Working Papers
Panizzon, Marion , Sieber-Gasser, Charlotte


Legal Framework for Cross-Regional Networks: The Case of Services and Migration

Legal Framework for Cross-Regional Networks: The Case of Services and Migration

Paper prepared by Marion Panizzon and Charlotte Sieber-Gasser for the International Conference on the Political Economy of Liberalising Trade in Services, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 14-15 June 2010

Recent literature has shed light on the economic potential of cross-border networks. These networks, consisting of expatriates and their acquaintances from abroad and at home, provide the basis for the creation of cross-border value added chains and therewith the means for turning brain drain into brain circulation. Both aspects are potentially valuable for economic growth in the developing world. Unilateral co-development policies operating through co-funding of expatriate business ventures, but also bilateral agreements liberalising circular migration for a limited set of per-sons testify to the increasing awareness of governments about the potential, which expatriate networks hold for economic growth in developing countries. Whereas such punctual efforts are valuable, viewed from a long term perspective, these top-down, government mandated Diaspora stimulation programs, will not replace, this paper ar-gues, the market-driven liberalisation of infrastructure and other services in develop-ing countries. Nor will they carry, in the case of circular labour migration, the politi-cal momentum to liberalise labour market admission for those non-nationals, who will eventually emerge as the future transnational entrepreneurs. It will take a combi-nation of mode 4 and infrastructure services openings-cum regulation for countries at both sides of the spectrum to provide the basis and pre-condition for transnational business and entrepreneurial networks to emerge and translate into cross-border, value added production chains.

Two key issues are of particular relevance in this context: (i) the services sector, es-pecially in infrastructure, tends to suffer from inefficiencies, particularly in develop-ing countries, and (ii) labour migration, a highly complex issue, still faces dispropor-tionately rigid barriers despite well-documented global welfare gains. Both are hin-drances for emerging markets to fully take advantage of the potential of these cross-border networks. Adapting the legal framework for enhancing the regulatory and in-stitutional frameworks for services trade, especially in infrastructure services sectors (ISS) and labour migration could provide the incentives necessary for brain circula-tion and strengthen cross-border value added chains by lowering transaction costs.

This paper analyses the shortfalls of the global legal framework – the shallow status quo of GATS commitments in ISS and mode 4 particular – in relation to stimulating brain circulation and the creation of cross-border value added chains in emerging markets. It highlights the necessity of adapting the legal framework, both on the glo-bal and the regional level, to stimulate broader and wider market access in the four key ISS sectors (telecommunications, transport, professional and financial services) in developing countries, as domestic supply capacity, global competitiveness and economic diversification in ISS sectors are necessary for mobilising expatriate re-turns, both physical and virtual. The paper argues that industrialised, labour receiving countries need to offer mode 4 market access to wider categories of persons, espe-cially to students, graduate trainees and young professionals from abroad. Further-more, free trade in semi-finished products and mode 4 market access are crucial for the creation of cross-border value added chains across the developing world. Finally, the paper discusses on the basis of a case study on Jordan why the key features of trade agreements, which promote circular migration and the creation of cross-border value added chains, consist of trade liberalisation in services and liberal migration policies.

Paper "Legal Framework for Cross-Regional Networks"